QUESTION:.
A question from J.M., in British Columbia. "Regarding the U.S. Constitution information, the Canadian government recently attempted to revise the Constitution. However, changes were defeated by the Canadian people. Many tactics were used, ranging from guilt trips regarding patriots, East versus West, English versus French and so forth; plus, the infamous dinner invitation, which appeared to be an unofficial kidnapping of the provincial leaders. The bottom-line proposed changes were not accepted by the Canadian people and the matter laid to rest, or was it?" And then she has three questions which I’ll read here: "Was that the original intent and purpose of this revision effort? Was the revision as proposed truly beneficial for Canadians, but they really did not understand it, as suggested by the present Prime Minister Kim Campbell? Or, was all that time and energy and money devoted to this proposed revision a sort of diversion for ‘other activities’?"
COSMIC AWARENESS:
This Awareness indicates that it appeared that there was a kind of testing going on in regard to that Constitution in Canada. The nature of most people is to protect their tradition, to protect the current and present laws of the land, and because of this, these entities having to choose from that which has worked for hundreds of years, over that which is not suggested a change, most entities would prefer to stay with what they know rather than to take a chance on something new that they have not tested nor perhaps fully understand. Therefore, the provision to change the Constitution simply did not sit well with most entities, who perhaps did not have enough understanding to see what the changes would bring, or were suspicious to any change to their traditional values. This Awareness indicates that it provided certain information to those who would make such changes, that the changes will not be easy, or that people simply do not go along with change just for the sake of change, or just because some authority says the change would be beneficial This Awareness indicates that it is likely to be a lesson also for those who wish to tamper with the United States Constitution; that there is still a great loyalty to that instrument, even though many entities do not fully understand the rights and laws of the Constitution enough to quote or realize how much freedom it gives, and even though many of the people recognize it as an instrument that does not fulfill every wish that entities might have, in that for example, it perhaps gives protection to some criminals, which many entities would like taken away.
This Awareness indicates that when it comes down to the very heart of the matter, whether to change the U.S. Constitution for something that is different, it appears that the people will object strongly to any changes. There has been a history of suffering and an effort and struggle by many people to protect the Constitution and that which it has given, along with the additional amendments that have come from such hard work by many entities, so that the Constitution has changed sufficiently to add greater self-determination by the masses and greater protection from any potential tyrannical government.
The people are not likely to give up this instrument with out a great struggle, without a civil war.
