FOLLOW-UP QUESTION:
Okay, there is truth to this article then. It calls them "UBMs", unidentified body markings, and these were reported in 60% of the kidnapping cases over the last three years, to a hotline run by the UFO Research Institute of Canada, and it says UBMs can be easily seen under a fluorescent tube, ultraviolet lamp, and some of the abductees also reported numbness underneath parts of their skin, sometimes going deeply into muscle tissue. And the article goes on to say that American UFO researchers conducting their own research surveys say the markings are also showing up in the skins of abductees from the U.S. The victims appear to be people who have no reason to lie and in many cases participated in these surveys with great reluctance.
COSMIC AWARENESS:
This Awareness indicates that it is further evidence of a branding type of marking or trademark symbol of those who perpetrate the abduction or who operate in a particular area to put similar marks on the earth.
ABOUT THOSE SYMBOLS ENERGIZED
FOLLOW-UP QUESTION:
What would their motive be, to come up with the symbol that these people energized?
COSMIC AWARENESS:
This Awareness indicates that it may not have been motivated at all. It may have simply been that these entities energized a symbol, either a symbol they had already collectively agreed upon, perhaps because they had seen such a symbol, or it may have been a symbol they collectively energized that was completely unique and new, but which was telepathically received by some extraterrestrial, and they may have simply incorporated it in their design in some way, or it could well have simply been coincidental. It may not have been the same symbol, but similar in its design, and perceived as being the same, when the entities saw it in the field. This Awareness indicates you cannot conclude conclusively from what the entity stated that his assumption is correct — that the extraterrestrials took his group’s mental symbol and drew it out on the field for the purpose of communicating with them. You cannot conclude this based on an assertion that they had visualized together a symbol, and it appeared later in the field.
Had the symbol been actually designed in writing or simply remembered in the mind by the entities? How well was it remembered? Did the entities see exactly in their minds the symbol that later was produced on the field? Were these symbols really exact? Are they the kind of symbol that might appear commonly?
For example, was the symbol a simple circle with some type of notch at one side, or was it a very complex symbol with many different geometrical features that made it unique and which appeared exactly the same in the field? It is easy for entities to conclude that the symbol they held in their minds was the same symbol that appeared on the field, but often entities want to see such things for verification of their own special experiences, when it might have been quite different, if closely examined by an outsider.
This Awareness indicates that if a number of people other than this group could duplicate that same experiment, whereby they visualized a unique symbol and that unique symbol appeared in the field shortly thereafter, then this repetition would add to the evidence of the truth of the claim, but otherwise, it is simply a claim which one either believes or doesn’t believe, and you can’t base an assumption simply because someone claims something, you can’t assume it to be absolute fact. You can’t use it as a premise to build a logical argument, for it may be faulty. It may be misunderstood or mis-remembered.
